|
Senate
Bill 416
-
SB 416 is an effort to expedite and streamline the process
at the IURC for service territory boundary line changes when
a municipality annexes an area.
-
The bill provides that a municipality that annexes an area
beyond the assigned service area boundaries of its municipal
electric utility may petition the IURC to change the service
territory to include the annexed area. Such a petition must
be filed within 60 days after the annexation becomes effective
and attached to it must be a certified copy of the annexation
ordinance.
-
The IURC is then required to enter an order changing the service
territory of the affected electricity suppliers promptly,
which should help to avoid long litigation before the IURC
and make the change essentially automatic.
-
Under the provisions of SB 416, the municipal utility is required
to calculate and pay to each incumbent supplier the value
of all property which was devoted to furnishing retail electric
service within the annexed area at its reproduction cost new
depreciated value.
-
The municipal electric utility also must pay severance damages
based on the value of the distribution and substation facilities
located in the area of 2 ½ times the gross revenues
from electricity sales in that area during the 12 months preceding
the effective date of the annexation ordinances, whichever
is greater.
-
SB 416 also sets in place a mechanism by which the municipal
utility would pay additional severance damages to the incumbent
supplier in the event that new customers locate in the annexed
area within five years of the effective date of annexation.
If new customers would come in within that 5 year period,
then severance damages of one mil (.001) per kilowatt hour
of electricity sold, up to a maximum of 170,000 kwh per month
per customer, would kick in for a five year period from the
point that the service is established.
-
Finally, and very importantly, this legislation would set
in place a certainty that the IURC would approve the service
boundary line changes unless it was determined that such a
change would result in a duplication of facilities, waste
of resources, or inefficient, uneconomic or inadequate service
to the public.
Return
to Legislation/Regulation page
|